But people take what they wish from the Bible - which also promises that God can reveal more to believers - so it's very difficult to apply literary exegesis, isn't it?-LeValley 02:27, (UTC) Speaking of 'who cooked the food'.
Where the subject was previously discussed and the section of the article The Last Supper (Leonardo da Vinci Medium which covers this.
That's covered in Last Supper.
The story about the missing cup is entirely fiction.I suppose this is just a joke?I think the section should be removed but I'd like to hear the opinion of some other contributor.Basically, if you overlap any row of people who are at different angles and have hands in different positions, then you are going to get people holding people, people with two heads, people with three eyes, people with four arms, butterfly shapes, chalice shapes, vase.I'd like to see a citation that states it was built as a refectory - or even that "Last Suppers" were common in monks' dining halls (instead, the fact that the painting was there was something of an embarrassment to the ascetic Dominicans).The figures of the disciples offerte lavoro giornalisti sicilia are grouped in a triangular Trinity formation around Christ.Unfortunately, Leonardo's style experiment was a disaster.Simply because it has supporting evidence towards the idea that the person seated to right of Jesus could possibly be a women.According to some authors the apostle John next to Christ is actually a woman.
It only showed up after the restoration of the work (it was not in evidence before).C-Class on the quality scale.I also took out several entries in the modern art section.These are tributes to Leonardo's patron duke.Paul B ( offerte cellulari usati milano talk ) 17:09, (UTC) So you're saying works of fiction should be used to support topics in an encyclopedia?